AI Coaching & Workflows
Bring a task you repeat, avoid, or cannot yet use AI for reliably. I help you define the outcome, map the current method, choose where AI earns a place, and build the prompts, checks, and documentation needed to run it with confidence.
Request a fit callRecommended starting point
A 90-minute online session plus a short written next-step plan. We examine your current work, identify one realistic workflow, clarify risks, and define what to do next.
You receive the complete format and written plan. In return, I ask for structured private feedback that helps refine the service; public feedback is optional.
Read the session, payment and cancellation arrangements
Illustrative agenda, adapted by agreement to your task. This is a planning example, not a guarantee that a project is solved in one session.
Bring an anonymised or synthetic example and the rules that apply. The agreed written plan records priorities and checks; ongoing implementation or unlimited support is not included unless separately agreed.
Inspect a sample plan and checklistInteractive process
Explore the stages and a worked example. Hover or focus to preview; click or tap to keep a stage selected.
We identify the decision, document, analysis, or workflow you need to produce, then define what good looks like and when it is needed. Only then do we decide whether AI has a useful role.
A one-page update: decisions, open questions, owners, and next dates.
Together, we map the current steps, skill level, approved tools and licences, data sensitivity, quality risks, and how often the task repeats. This reveals what should stay human and what can be supported safely.
Use approved, non-sensitive notes. Keep decisions and commitments under human control.
We choose only useful AI touchpoints and connect them with prompts, human checks, and documentation. A repeatable design beats a collection of disconnected chats.
Group the supplied notes into decisions, questions, and actions. Mark missing owners; do not invent them.
Outputs are tested against sources, assumptions, privacy requirements, and relevant rules. Reliable use depends on knowing when the model should not be trusted.
Match each action, date, and owner to its source. Resolve missing information before sharing.
You should be able to explain, run, adapt, and stop the workflow yourself. The tool may assist, but judgment, accountability, and final decisions remain human.
Save the brief, prompt, and checklist. Review the final update yourself each week.
We identify the decision, document, analysis, or workflow you need to produce, then define what good looks like and when it is needed. Only then do we decide whether AI has a useful role.
Illustrative example: A one-page update: decisions, open questions, owners, and next dates.
Result: A clear aim and quality standard
Together, we map the current steps, skill level, approved tools and licences, data sensitivity, quality risks, and how often the task repeats. This reveals what should stay human and what can be supported safely.
Illustrative example: Use approved, non-sensitive notes. Keep decisions and commitments under human control.
Result: Useful opportunities and hard constraints mapped
We choose only useful AI touchpoints and connect them with prompts, human checks, and documentation. A repeatable design beats a collection of disconnected chats.
Illustrative example: Group the supplied notes into decisions, questions, and actions. Mark missing owners; do not invent them.
Result: A workable workflow draft
Outputs are tested against sources, assumptions, privacy requirements, and relevant rules. Reliable use depends on knowing when the model should not be trusted.
Illustrative example: Match each action, date, and owner to its source. Resolve missing information before sharing.
Result: A clear verification routine
You should be able to explain, run, adapt, and stop the workflow yourself. The tool may assist, but judgment, accountability, and final decisions remain human.
Illustrative example: Save the brief, prompt, and checklist. Review the final update yourself each week.
Result: A repeatable workflow you control
What we work on
Every project begins with an assessment. The right format then depends on whether one person needs a working method, a team needs shared rules, or a proven workflow should become reusable material.
For one person and one concrete task. We assess the current method, privacy and quality requirements, then build one repeatable workflow with explicit human checks.
For 2-6 people who need one common way of working. We assess roles, skill levels, approved tools, licences, hand-offs, and shared risks before designing the team method.
After the diagnostic has proven the method, it can be translated into prompt templates, checklists, workflow notes, or carefully bounded support materials. This is scoped separately.
Capability ladder
A broad introduction of about two hours can cover how language models work, prompting, hallucinations, verification, privacy, and limits.
Move from isolated chats to repeatable, documented ways of working with ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, or another suitable environment.
Combine task steps, human checks, reusable prompts, and realistic ownership so the workflow can survive beyond one session.
Feasibility reviews and guided prototypes only after scoping data, permissions, oversight, dependencies, maintenance, and failure modes.
Questions before you decide
No. The review can start with foundations or improve an existing workflow. The level is determined by your actual task, not by a generic course sequence.
Only tools that fit the task and that you can legitimately access, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, or another approved environment.
Every team starts with a short assessment of roles, skill levels, tools, licences, data, and risks. The shared session and final price are confirmed after that assessment.
Advanced work begins with feasibility, oversight, permissions, maintenance, and failure modes. Advice and guided prototypes can be scoped; open-ended production-agent promises are not offered.
A grounded next step
The short intake identifies the aim, constraints, and right format before any paid work begins.
